There’s no secret about the fact that almost every business in the world uses some form of Microsoft operating environment. Whether it’s the company’s mainstream consumer Windows operating system, or the more advanced Windows Server systems, it’s hard to escape the reach of Microsoft among corporate and enterprise clients. For these people, there is a natural way to shop for web hosting. That includes choosing products based on Microsoft Windows technologies and communicating over remotely-hosted Microsoft Exchange email servers. It’s a no-brainer because it’s simply so easy to setup and configure. Windows Server Web Edition is designed specifically for Windows web hosting and web servingWhen an enterprise client is looking for hosting, they’re searching for a product which can seamlessly integrate with their existing setup. The key to this process is to save time and money by investing in something which is essentially “plug and play.” Once the hosting plan is purchased and data is transferred, a few easy settings should be able to be configured and the product will be available to entire base of employees within any one company or enterprise setup. That solution is Microsoft.
First and foremost, the company offers the number one database product among major enterprise customers in the form of Microsoft SQL. When combined with the Microsoft Access application which ships as part of the Microsoft Office suite of productivity applications, this data can be easily synced among desktop computers and between those computers and the remote web hosting server itself. This is an especially big consideration, as it would take a great deal of time to make the same functions operate between a Microsoft-designed database and an open source alternative based on a remote server.
In addition to Windows servers’ support of Microsoft’s popular database protocols, these servers also support deep integration with the Microsoft desktop in the form of a remote file server. Most enterprises, before they switched to a Windows web hosting server, simply had their own in-house computer which remotely hosted files for their employees. Moving these files to the cloud is now imperative, as it allows universal access on mobile devices, home computers, and corporate machines.
Microsoft allows these servers to be setup by simply plugging in a few settings via the standard Windows control panel interface. The server is then able to be seen as a native component of the operating system by every Windows computer on the company’s network. That process would take far longer to configure and deploy when choosing an open source alternative.
The most popular method of communicating among major business and enterprises is a combination of the Microsoft Exchange email server software and Microsoft SharePoint collaboration technologies. As these two technologies have evolved, they’ve made it possible for on-the-go communication that syncs between remote and mobile denies as well as company computers and servers.
There are certainly open source alternatives to these technologies, but they’re far less-developed and they take a great deal of time to integrate into the traditional Microsoft environment. Because almost every office uses Microsoft Outlook for its email services, it simply makes sense to choose a Windows host that can immediately plug into that software. On top of it, the web-based interface for these applications closely mirrors the desktop counterpart. That means there’s a very little, if any, learning curve when choosing a Windows server for an enterprise environment.
Simply put, a Windows server is best-suited for business and enterprise customers who are committed to the Microsoft “ecosystem.” That system involves the Microsoft Office suite of applications, easy configuration and integration with Windows, the world’s most popular desktop operating system, and easy deployment and syncing to mobile devices and home computers using technologies like Exchange and SharePoint. While these servers can also be used by individual web hosting clients and those who just prefer Microsoft technologies, it’s highly unlikely that they’d be any better served by a Windows server than one based on Unix. In fact, the Unix method of hosting may be better for their very different needs and requirements.